Tattooed Conn. officer fighting to keep his job

The officer is facing possible termination over his latest tattoos

Mary E. O'Leary
New Haven Register, Conn.

NEW HAVEN, Conn. — Veni Vidi Vici.

To Officer Jason Bandy that Latin phrase uttered by Julius Caesar — I came I saw I conquered — expresses the way he looks at life. If you have a goal, you should resolve to reach it.

Officer Jason Bandy
Officer Jason Bandy (Photo/ New Haven Police Department)

That phrase, along with a small tattoo of a stylized capital D, which refers to Detroit, where most of his family is from and small Roman numerals for the date 4004 B.C. are the latest tattoos that Bandy wears. They are on his hairline around his face.

The officer had tattoos on most of his body when he was hired as an officer in 2008; several years later he added tattoos to his neck and hands with no backlash as the department does not have a policy against tattoos, Bandy said.

There are multiple officers who wear tattoos, Bandy said, who have not been disciplined, given that there is no specific policy against it.

Bandy is now facing possible termination on Wednesday when he appears before the Board of Police Commissioners over his latest tattoos. Among items on a posted agenda, members are expected to consider and “vote on the recommendation of Chief (Anthony) Campbell on the termination of Officer Jason Bandy.”

“This is about treating people with respect. This is about following rules,” Bandy said, referring to the non-existent tattoo policy. “I am being treated in the manner that I was taught not to treat people.”

Bandy said some people might personally feel no officer should have tattoos.

“This is not about that. Your personal opinion is your personal opinion,” he said.

In October 2018, he filed a complaint with the state Commission on Equal Opportunity, claiming gender discrimination. He charged that female members of the department are allegedly violating the general order of the department that refers to personal appearance with no ramifications.

He said there is a department policy that officers not wear jewelry, other than wedding bands and religious attire. Also, no piercings are allowed, such as nose or eyebrow piercing; no excessive makeup, no hair dying “in excessive colors,” Bandy said in his complaint.

“Everyday for the past 11 years of my career, I have seen females violate this policy daily. Females regularly wear excessive makeup, dye their hair red, blue, green. Nose piercings, nail polish, unapproved jewelry and even tattooed eyebrows and eyeliner, which is no different than any other type of tattoo,” he wrote.

He told the CHRO that the police administration wanted him to undergo laser surgery to get rid of the facial tattoos and to pay for it himself.

When he and his union, Elm City Local, CACP, rejected that, the administration then offered a memorandum of understanding stating that he would be considered “in compliance with Department grooming standards so long as he covers his tattoos while on duty with make-up/concealer which fully obscures the three newly obtained tattoos on his face.”

It continued: “The Department may refer Officer Bandy to the Board of Police Commissioners for potential termination for noncompliance, whether such is intentional or not (e.g. weather related).”

Bandy said that would set him up for failure if the concealer were to start to come off in the rain. He said he had no problem agreeing to cover the facial tattoos with makeup/concealer.

The MOU was amended two days later. “Officer Bandy shall be subject to referral to the Board of Police Commissioners for potential termination of employment for noncompliance, unless the chief of police determines that extenuating circumstances excuse such noncompliance.”

Bandy said he did not trust that he would be treated fairly by the administration and he would always be worried about falling into noncompliance.

The MOU also said the terms of the agreement would not set a precedent “with respect to any other Elm City Local bargaining unit member, nor shall it constitute any form of a past practice on either party.”

It also required Bandy “to withdraw his pending CHRO matter alleging gender discrimination based on the Departmental response to his facial tattoos.”

The officer said he has a legal right to file a CHRO complaint.

Police Chief Anthony Campbell, in filing charges against Bandy, cited General Order 85 on uniforms, equipment and grooming: “All employees (sworn and non-sworn) shall present a neat and clean appearance while on-duty.”

He also cited General Order 1.03: “Employees are expected to present themselves in a businesslike manner. To this extent, police officers are expected to be in the proper uniform and present a neat and professional appearance (except as otherwise authorized by the chief of police or his/her designee.)”

Campbell, in his letter to Bandy telling him to come before the police commissioners, said Bandy “has been offered reasonable accommodations but has refused to accept any of those accommodations.”

Campbell did not respond to a request for comment on the case.

Bandy, when he had been on the job for less than a year, called out from working a midnight shift. He later joined a friend at a bar where he became drunk and was charged with breach of peace, disorderly conduct and interfering with police.

He was fired for that episode but eventually got accelerated rehabilitation, a lenient form of prbation, and the charges have been wiped from his record. Bandy got his job back in 2011

Bandy said his termination when he was 23 “was a big part of my life.”

“It is a big part of who I am. I have learned a lot about myself , about people, about this profession because of that. And that has helped me over my years. It has helped me become more genuine, it has helped me become more humane and it has helped me basically respect and understand people more because I went through something. That has made me into a better police officer,” Bandy said.

Retired Lt. Vincent Anastasio said Bandy worked for him for several years and he was a pleasure to have on the job.

“He did everything I asked him to do. He was always respectful of me and respectful of the community,” Anastasio said. He said the fact that he had tattoos had nothing to do with his performance. With no policy on tattoos, the administration has no grounds to fire him, the lieutenant said.

Anastasio said Bandy turned himself around after the incident early in his career.

Bandy said he feels that the department continues to unfairly target him and is holding him back from advancing in the department. “That is unacceptable,” Bandy said.

He filed a lawsuit against then-Chief Dean Esserman and Assistant Chief Luiz Casanova in 2015, alleging that they had harassed and discriminated against him after the termination, causing him emotional distress. That suit is still pending.


©2019 the New Haven Register (New Haven, Conn.)

McClatchy-Tribune News Service

Recommended for you

Copyright © 2022 Police1. All rights reserved.