Trending Topics

US issues guidelines for FBI custody of terrorist suspects

Rules outline scenarios for agency holding those arrested by federal LE

Robert-mueller-fbi-285x245.jpg

In this Dec. 14, 2011, file photo FBI Director Robert Mueller testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on FBI oversight on Capitol Hill in Washington. In his Nov. 28 letter to Congress, Mueller said Congress’s new terrorism rules will inhibit the FBI’s ability to persuade suspected terrorists to cooperate immediately and provide critical intelligence. He tried again to make the point at the hearing, but got little sympathy from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. Said Mueller, “What I am focused on is what happens at the time of arrest,” to which Sessions answered, “Well, then you need to work this out with the Department of Defense, don’t you?”

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

By Pete Yost
Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration outlined on Tuesday the situations in which the FBI, rather than the military, could be allowed to retain custody of al-Qaida terrorist suspects who are not U.S. citizens but are arrested by federal law enforcement officers.

The new rules issued by the White House resulted from a compromise with a majority of Republicans and some Democrats in Congress who wanted a bigger military role and a reduced role for civilian courts in the fight against terrorism.

The new law that emerged requires military custody for non-U.S. citizen members of al-Qaida or “associated forces” involved in planning or attempting an attack on the United States or coalition partners, unless the president waives that provision.

As expected, the rules for presidential waiver provided flexibility that was not available under the initial military custody requirement.

“Our criminal justice system has demonstrated unrivaled effectiveness” in preserving and protecting U.S. national security objectives, the White House said in an explanatory document accompanying the rules. “That system ... must continue to be an unrestricted counterterrorism tool going forward.”

The new rules outlined seven circumstances in which the president could place a suspect in FBI, rather than military, custody.

National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said the seven exceptions were a case of President Barack Obama fulfilling a pledge to address lingering concerns he had in December when he signed the defense authorization bill containing the rules.

Late Tuesday, three Republicans on the Senate Armed Services Committee issued a statement expressing deep concerns about the administration’s rules.

“Although we have not been able to fully examine all the details of these new regulations, they raise significant concerns that will require a hearing in the Senate Armed Services Committee. We are particularly concerned that some of these regulations may contradict the intent of the detainee provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act,” Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Kelly Ayotte said.

Military custody could be waived when it would impede counterterror cooperation with another government or when it could interfere with efforts to secure an individual’s cooperation or confession.

Other exceptions to military custody could be when:

— A legal permanent U.S. resident is arrested inside the U.S. or is arrested on the basis of conduct inside the U.S.

— Military custody could interfere with efforts to conduct a trial.

— Putting one of several alleged co-conspirators in military custody could interfere with efforts to conduct a joint trial.

— An individual is arrested by state or local authorities and transferred to federal custody.

— A foreign government will not consent to extraditing someone because the suspect would be placed in military custody.

In a Nov. 28 letter to Congress that was central to securing the compromise, FBI Director Robert Mueller said that absent changes, the new law would inhibit the bureau’s ability to persuade suspected terrorists to cooperate immediately and provide critical intelligence.

Mueller told Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that it was unclear how agents should operate if they arrested someone covered by the military custody requirement hundreds of miles from the nearest military facility.

In December, the Senate Armed Forces Committee chairman, Sen. Carl Levin, said the measure passed by Congress “has been written to be doubly sure that there is no interference with civilian interrogations and other law enforcement activities and to ensure that the president has the flexibility he needs.”

Copyright 2012 Associated Press