Trending Topics

Tribal lawsuit: Sheriff threatened to block access to casinos amid COVID-19 concern

Sheriff Bill Gore threatened to restrict access to tribal lands in an effort to get casinos to close their doors, the lawsuit says


The Jamul Casino on the Jamul Indian Reservation, shown here on April 15, 2020.

K.C. Alfred/San Diego Union-Tribune/TNS

By Lyndsay Winkley
The San Diego Union-Tribune

SAN DIEGO — A lawsuit filed by one of San Diego County’s tribes reveals that COVID-19 was already spreading among casino employees and patrons in the early days of the pandemic and that Sheriff Bill Gore, in an effort to get casinos to close their doors, threatened to restrict access to tribal lands.

The Aug. 6 suit was filed by the Jamul Indian Village Development Corp. — the company that operates the Jamul Casino and a branch of the Jamul Indian Village’s tribal government — against its insurance provider, Lexington Insurance Co.

While arguing that Lexington had wrongly refused to reimburse the tribe for losses it suffered during the pandemic, the tribe also shed light on how quickly COVID-19 began affecting casinos and how seriously the county responded to that potential public health threat.

According to the lawsuit, around March 12 — a day after the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus a pandemic — the Jamul Indian Village learned that two Jamul Casino employees and a casino patron had likely contracted COVID-19. Around that same time, they also learned of an employee who had been exposed to the virus.

Nearly a week later, San Diego County imposed new public health restrictions that banned indoor dining and gatherings of 50 or more people — two regulations that directly affected casinos.

Sheriff Gore sent two strongly worded letters to the tribes soon after.

In a letter sent on March 18, Gore informed the tribes that any establishment that refused to follow the county’s new rules would be in violation of the public health order — an order the sheriff had the power to enforce.

Although casinos were in operation at the time, five tribal governments announced that same day that they intended to close on March 20.

The sheriff sent a second letter to the tribes on March 19, the day before the expected closures. In it, Gore said if the tribes did not comply with the county health order, he would be forced to “take measures to protect public safety.”

“This will, at a minimum, include restricting access to tribal lands by the general public,” the letter read. It also stated that failing to comply with the health order could impact a tribe’s ability to “obtain assistance and reimbursement for emergency protective measures such as law enforcement and other measures necessary to protect public health and safety.”

The letter stated later, “… the issue of whether tribal sovereignty precludes enforcement of the Public Health Officer’s order on tribal lands is a discussion that must be had at a later date.”

Department officials said the March 18 letter, which was shorter but similar to the March 19 letter, was actually sent out inadvertently before it was complete, and it’s unclear if every tribe received it. All tribes received the second letter.

The department added in a statement this week that the letters were sent at the beginning of the pandemic “when the urgency to save lives was at stake.”

California’s stay-at-home order also went into effect on March 19 and, on March 20, casinos across the county closed.

Erica Pinto, chairwoman of the Jamul Indian Village Development Corp., said Gore’s letters were not part of the tribe’s decision to close its casino. Instead, the lawsuit states the decision came after the Jamul Indian Village Tribal Council declared a reservationwide state of emergency, which mandated that all tribal businesses, including the casino, close to the public as soon as possible.

“We do not fall under jurisdiction of the county,” Pinto said. “Our decision to close was strictly a joint effort to protect the people.”

After a two-month closure, casinos reopened, despite county health officials saying they strongly disagreed with the decision.

Upon reopening, many casinos touted additional health and safety measures designed to slow the spread of COVID-19.

The Sheriff’s Department said in a statement last week that they did not send any additional letters when casinos reopened in part because of the tribes’ “implementation of extensive mitigation procedures.”

However, since then, the county has not publicly released information about outbreaks that may have occurred at local casinos, deferring to the tribes who have sovereign authority.

County officials have not explained why tribal sovereignty impedes the county’s ability to report outbreaks that stem from casinos, which are identified through county-run contact tracing efforts and mostly involve San Diego County residents.

Although outbreak information remains mysterious, since the pandemic began, county officials have identified 217 San Diego County residents who stated they were at a casino in the 14 days prior to illness onset.

Of those, 76 were casino staff members and 141 were patrons. Seven different casinos were named. Twelve of the individuals were hospitalized, and one person identified as a casino patron died.

Some of the 217 cases may have been contagious while at a casino, so close contacts were identified and quarantined.

County officials also noted that just because a person was at a casino during the potential exposure period doesn’t mean that they contracted the virus at said casino.

“We have repeatedly commented that going to a casino is not essential and that anyone who does so should wear a mask, wash hands, and socially distance,” said county spokesman Michael Workman. “Going to a casino would place a person at higher risk for contracting COVID compared to not attending, and those who do go are encouraged to review the precautions that the casino is taking to prevent illness.”

©2020 The San Diego Union-Tribune