In the fourth of a seven-part Policing Matters Roll Call series on use of force, host Jim Dudley engages with Jamie Borden from Critical Incident Review.
Borden emphasizes the need for a balanced understanding of deescalation, highlighting that the outcome of an encounter is not solely in the hands of law enforcement officers. Suspects’ actions play a critical role in the escalation or deescalation of incidents. Through his analysis, Borden sheds light on the unrealistic expectations placed on officers and the need for a more comprehensive understanding of deescalation among both law enforcement professionals and the community.
Key learning points
Deescalation as a goal, not a tactic: Understanding deescalation as a goal allows for a more holistic approach to managing incidents, involving a series of tactical decisions rather than a single, prescriptive action.
The role of suspect behavior: The actions of individuals encountered by police significantly influence the potential for de-escalation, emphasizing that responsibility also lies with those being detained or apprehended.
Realistic expectations and training: There is a crucial need for realistic expectations regarding de-escalation from both the community and law enforcement, alongside targeted training that prepares officers for a variety of outcomes.
Questions for discussion
- How can law enforcement training better integrate the concept of deescalation as a goal within the context of varied and unpredictable encounters?
- What steps can be taken to adjust public expectations regarding the complexities and challenges of de-escalation in law enforcement?
- How can legislation and policy development support a more balanced approach to managing encounters between police officers and suspects, recognizing the shared responsibility for de-escalation?
The entire series is available for viewing below.
