Trending Topics

Rational choice theory and crime: How technology shapes criminal decision-making

Using tech to shift offender decision-making and prevent crime, not just respond to it

Sinister silhouette man lurking in deserted parking lot

When implemented effectively, gunfire detection systems serve as more than just reactive tools, they become proactive deterrents.

coldsnowstorm/Getty Images

By Rich Bash

Crime prevention is a complex endeavor that draws on sociology, psychology, economics and, increasingly, technology. One influential framework that helps explain criminal behavior is rational choice theory, which views individuals as decision-makers who weigh the costs and benefits of their actions. When applied to crime, this theory suggests that people are less likely to offend if the perceived risks outweigh the potential rewards.

Today, criminal justice organizations are leveraging advanced technologies, such as gunshot detection systems, to reshape that risk-reward balance in real time. These tools don’t just help catch criminals — they help deter crime altogether. This article explores how technology intersects with rational choice theory to create safer communities.

| RELATED: Policing smarter: Why it’s time to prepare for grant funding in tech-driven crime fighting

Understanding rational choice theory

At its core, rational choice theory (RCT) proposes that people make decisions based on logical calculations. Before engaging in any behavior — including criminal activity — individuals assess the potential benefits (e.g., money, power, status) and weigh them against the risks (e.g., arrest, injury, social stigma).

The origins of RCT date back to the Enlightenment, with thinkers like Thomas Hobbes, Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, who emphasized rationality in human decision-making. Beccaria, for instance, argued in the 18th century that crime could be prevented through proportionate and swift punishment — a principle rooted in rational deterrence.

Fast-forward to the 1980s, when criminologists Ronald Clarke and Derek Cornish adapted RCT for modern crime prevention. They argued that offenders engage in a form of “situational analysis,” calculating their chances of success, the effort involved and the likelihood of getting caught.

In this context, reducing crime becomes not just about punishing offenders but about altering the decision-making environment — and that’s where technology comes into play.

Acoustic gunfire detection technology in action

One of the most transformative tools in law enforcement today is acoustic gunfire location technology, such as ShotSpotter. These systems use a network of audio sensors to detect and locate gunshots in real time. But their impact goes far beyond faster response times — they can also influence criminal decision-making through the mechanisms described by rational choice theory.

Here’s how:

1. Increased risk of detection: Gunfire detection systems can identify the precise location of a shooting within seconds and notify police almost instantly. This reduces the window of time in which offenders can escape, increasing the perceived risk of apprehension. As a result, potential shooters may reconsider their actions, knowing their anonymity and getaway time are drastically reduced.

2. Enhanced law enforcement presence: Quick and accurate deployment of police to gunfire locations sends a strong message: criminal actions will be met with immediate response. This visible law enforcement presence can serve as a deterrent, particularly in neighborhoods where criminals may otherwise assume they can act without consequence.

3. Community and offender awareness: The deterrent effect is magnified when the community — and potential offenders — are aware that this technology is in use. Public campaigns, community meetings and media coverage can all reinforce this message. For example, highlighting arrests made possible through acoustic gunfire location technology in the news or on social media signals increased surveillance, which can alter offenders’ calculations.

Tip for agencies: Leverage multiple media channels to communicate the effectiveness of your gunshot detection systems. The broader the awareness, the stronger the deterrent.

4. Reduction in crime opportunities: Beyond immediate deterrence, gunfire detection data allows for strategic policing. By identifying patterns and hotspots, law enforcement can proactively deploy patrols, engage community partners or install surveillance in high-risk areas. This limits the opportunities for crime to occur in the first place — a key element in rational choice theory’s situational approach.

Technology as a deterrent: Putting theory into practice

When implemented effectively, gunfire detection systems serve as more than just reactive tools, they become proactive deterrents. They increase the cost of crime by:

  • Raising the likelihood of arrest
  • Shrinking the window for escape
  • Attracting immediate police attention
  • Drawing community scrutiny
  • Reducing anonymity and safe zones for offenders

At the same time, they reduce the benefits by disrupting the success of criminal actions, whether it’s retaliatory violence, illegal firearm use or drive-by shootings.

Smart technology for smarter crime prevention

Rational choice theory reminds us that most criminals aren’t acting blindly — they’re making calculated decisions. By shifting those calculations through enhanced detection and rapid response, technology like ShotSpotter discourages criminal behavior before it happens.

But tech alone isn’t enough. Its effectiveness depends on strategic implementation, interagency coordination and community engagement. When these elements align, gunfire detection technology becomes a powerful ally in the pursuit of public safety — one that not only responds to crime but helps prevent it by design.

About the author

Richard Bash retired from the Columbus Division of Police after 33 years of service, including twelve as Deputy Chief. Throughout his career, he held assignments in Patrol, Investigations, Covert Operations, School Resource, Mounted, Training, Human Resources, Fiscal, Internal Affairs, and Professional Standards.

He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Ohio Dominican University and a Master of Science in Management from Mount Vernon Nazarene University. He is also a graduate of the FBI National Academy, the Police Executive Leadership Institute (PELI), the Senior Management Institute for Police (SMIP), and the Police Executive Leadership College (PELC).

Today, he serves as Customer Success Director at SoundThinking, helping agencies nationwide implement gunshot detection technology. He is also an Adjunct Professor at Franklin University in Columbus, Ohio.

| WATCH: Two California police chiefs — one from sprawling Los Angeles, the other from a 2.6-square-mile city — share how collaborative data strategies and connected tech are revolutionizing crime prevention and response.

Police1 Special Contributors represent a diverse group of law enforcement professionals, trainers, and industry thought leaders who share their expertise on critical issues affecting public safety. These guest authors provide fresh perspectives, actionable advice, and firsthand experiences to inspire and educate officers at every stage of their careers. Learn from the best in the field with insights from Police1 Special Contributors.

(Note: The contents of personal or first person essays reflect the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Police1 or its staff.)

Interested in expert-driven resources delivered for free directly to your inbox? Subscribe for free to any our our Police1 newsletters.