Trending Topics

Ohio AG sues body armor manufacturer over sale of alleged counterfeit ballistic plates

ShotStop Ballistics is also facing federal probes after an investigation found the company was buying armor plates from China and claiming they were manufactured in the U.S.

Hispanic police officer wearing bulletproof vest

The complaint, filed in Summit County Common Pleas Court, follows a cross-agency investigation led by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The probe revealed that ShotStop, based in Stow, Ohio, allegedly imported ballistic plates from China and falsely labeled them as being manufactured in Ohio and certified by the National Institute of Justice.

kali9/Getty Images

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has filed a lawsuit against ShotStop Ballistics, its affiliate Vallmar Studios and company owner Vall Iliev, alleging the sale of unsafe and falsely marketed body armor, according to a news release.

The complaint, filed in Summit County Common Pleas Court, follows a cross-agency investigation led by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The probe revealed that ShotStop, based in Stow, Ohio, allegedly imported ballistic plates from China and falsely labeled them as being manufactured in Ohio and certified by the National Institute of Justice.

“Armor is meant to save lives, not sell lies,” Yost said in a statement. “Consumers deserve to know that this type of equipment is going to provide the protection promised.”

The lawsuit claims that ShotStop misrepresented the origin and safety certification of its products, which were sold through the company’s website and third-party retailers. Though the company at one point offered NIJ-certified plates, investigators say it later marketed uncertified plates as compliant with federal safety standards.

The body armor plates in question reportedly failed to meet the necessary standards to adequately protect users.
Yost’s office accuses ShotStop and its affiliates of violating Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act in two primary ways: misrepresenting the safety certification and manufacturing origin of their products and failing to deliver the authentic goods customers believed they were purchasing.

The lawsuit seeks restitution for consumers who unknowingly purchased the armor, according to the release. However, a full accounting of potential consumer losses is still pending due to ShotStop’s 2023 bankruptcy filing and the federal seizure of its records.

Federal criminal proceedings related to the case are ongoing. The state lawsuit marks an additional step in efforts to hold the company accountable for its alleged misconduct.

Trending
Leaders who fail to prioritize communications risk losing public trust — and even their jobs
Through her song “My Hero’s Prayer,” Beth Krah shares a message of faith and hope — a reminder to those on the frontlines that they are seen, valued and never alone
BWC video shows former Sangamon County Deputy Sean Grayson shooting Massey after she held up a pot of boiling water and said, “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus”
Sig Sauer has denied claims that the weapon is prone to unintentional discharge, citing the dismissal of multiple lawsuits surrounding the P320

Joanna Putman is an Associate Editor and newswriter at Police1, where she has been covering law enforcement topics since August 2023. Based in Orlando, Florida, she holds a journalism degree from the University of Florida and spent two years working in nonprofit local newsrooms, gaining experience in community-focused reporting. Married to a law enforcement officer, she works hard to highlight the challenges and triumphs of those who serve and protect. Have a news tip? Email her at news@lexipol.com