Editor’s note: This is the fourth article in Leading Smarter: The Department of Police Efficiency (DOPE) — a five-step guide to building a stronger, smarter police department using real-world strategies inspired by today’s top innovators. Learn how to break down complex problems, challenge outdated assumptions, rethink operations from the ground up and lead a department that’s ready for the future.
The fourth business principle used by Elon Musk can be used to tackle large-scale problems such as gang violence, drug trafficking and homelessness. Addressing these complex issues requires a comprehensive and strategic approach. Police departments should use data analytics to find the root causes of these problems. Root causes of these complex issues are not universal in every police jurisdiction. By analyzing crime data, social trends and other relevant information, command staff can gain insights into the underlying factors driving these issues. This data-driven approach allows for more targeted and effective interventions.
Building partnerships with local, state and federal agencies is crucial for tackling large-scale problems. Collaboration among various levels of government can provide added resources, expertise and support. Working together, agencies can share information, coordinate efforts and implement joint strategies to address these challenges. These partnerships can enhance the overall effectiveness of policing efforts.
| DOWNLOAD: 25 on 2025: A police leadership playbook
Engaging with communities is essential for fostering trust and cooperation. Police departments should actively involve community members in addressing these problems. By setting up open lines of communication, holding community meetings and involving residents in decision-making processes, police departments can build stronger relationships with the communities they serve. This engagement helps to build trust, encourage cooperation and create a sense of shared responsibility for public safety.
Implementing multi-pronged strategies is necessary to address the multifaceted nature of large-scale problems. For example, prevention programs for at-risk youth can help deter them from joining gangs or engaging in criminal activities. These programs can include mentorship, educational support and recreational activities such as the Police Athletic League.
Addiction treatment and mental health initiatives are vital for addressing mental health crises, drug trafficking and substance abuse issues. By providing teams of mental health clinicians paired with police officers, these at-risk individuals can be helped. This comprehensive approach not only enhances public safety but also promotes community well-being and resilience. Addressing concomitant offenses such as criminal trespass and other lower-level offenses can deter the larger issues.
Some examples of programs that address homelessness and drug trafficking are:
- Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) programs: Many cities, such as San Diego, have implemented HOT programs where law enforcement collaborates with social services to address homelessness. Officers focus on individuals trespassing on private or public property and connect them with housing, mental health services or addiction treatment instead of pursuing criminal charges. This approach reduces recidivism and addresses root causes.
- Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD): LEAD programs, like the one in Seattle, aim to divert low-level offenders, including those involved in trespassing or drug-related crimes, into treatment and support services rather than jail. By addressing homelessness and substance abuse, these programs reduce the burden on the criminal justice system and improve community outcomes.
- Community courts: Cities like Austin, Texas, have established community courts that handle cases involving trespassing and other low-level offenses. These courts focus on rehabilitation by offering offenders access to housing assistance, drug treatment and job training programs. This holistic approach helps individuals reintegrate into society while reducing repeat offenses.
- Rapid rehousing initiatives: Programs like the Homelessness Assistance Program in Irving, Texas, provide rapid rehousing for individuals experiencing homelessness. By stabilizing housing situations, these programs indirectly reduce trespassing and related issues, creating a pathway to recovery and stability.
- Collaborative policing models: In some areas, police departments partner with local nonprofits and community organizations to address criminal trespass violations. For example, outreach teams may work with property owners to identify frequent trespassers and connect them with resources like addiction counseling or temporary shelters.
| RELATED: Coordinated homeless outreach: Where does law enforcement fit in?
Measuring efficacy
Having a Professional Standards division would be essential to measuring the efficacy of these programs through audits. Just because a program is effective in its first or fifth year does not mean it will remain effective over time.
The auditor would look at key performance indicators such as reductions in incidents at targeted properties or declines in community drug-related crime rates. Pre- and post-implementation crime statistics would be used to evaluate impact — for example, changes in the frequency of criminal trespass, drug trafficking and related offenses in the targeted areas.
Programs would also need to track participation and outcomes, including long-term results such as sustained housing, maintaining employment and recidivism rates among participants.
Community feedback and perception surveys should be conducted with residents, program participants and stakeholders to assess changes in the public’s sense of safety and gather input on effectiveness and areas for improvement. This could be done by partnering with local universities or research institutions to carry out independent evaluations and cost-effectiveness studies.
Auditors should also conduct a cost-benefit analysis, comparing the program’s actual costs with measurable returns — including reduced enforcement and incarceration costs and the financial benefits of reducing homelessness, such as fewer emergency service calls or increased business development in affected areas.
By systematically applying these evaluation methods, departments can ensure that their programs are both effective and provide a positive return on investment, while aligning their efforts with community needs.
Questions for further discussion
- What are the main obstacles to interagency collaboration when tackling large-scale societal issues?
- How can data analytics improve strategies for addressing homelessness and mental health crises?
- What role should community-driven initiatives play in reducing gang recruitment and violence?
