Trending Topics

N.J. Second Amendment advocacy groups, gun owners sue state over suppressor ban

The complaint argues suppressors are commonly used for lawful purposes such as hearing protection, hunting and home defense, and are legal in 42 states

Gun Industry Trade Show

This photo taken Tuesday, Jan. 21 2020, shows firearms and suppressors on display at SHOT Show, the annual trade show for the gun industry in Las Vegas. The show is sponsored by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the lobbying group that represents gunmakers. Gunmakers and companies making an array of accessories put their wares on display each year. (AP Photo/Lisa Marie Pane)

Lisa Marie Pane/AP

By Anthony G. Attrino
nj.com

TRENTON, N.J. — A coalition of gun rights advocates and individual firearm owners has filed a lawsuit against New Jersey, claiming the state’s ban on firearm suppressors violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments.

The federal lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of a state law that criminalizes the possession of suppressors — also known as silencers — even when owned lawfully under federal law.

| DOWNLOAD: 25 on 2025: A police leadership playbook

Attorney General Matthew Platkin and State Police Superintendent Patrick Callahan are named as defendants in the complaint, which was filed July 18 in U.S. District Court.

A spokesperson for the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office said the office has no comment on the litigation.

The plaintiffs include three New Jersey residents along with the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, the Second Amendment Foundation, Safari Club International, New Jersey Firearm Owners Syndicate, the American Suppressor Association, and the National Rifle Association.

The complaint argues suppressors are commonly used for lawful purposes such as hearing protection, hunting, and home defense, and are legal in 42 states.

“Suppressors are neither dangerous nor unusual,” the suit states, pointing to a recent U.S. Supreme Court standard in New York State that prohibits banning firearms or accessories in common use.

New Jersey law, however, classifies suppressors as fourth-degree crimes, punishable by up to 18 months in prison, with a narrow exception for state-permitted deer management.

The suit argues that criminalization has no historical basis and is an outlier nationally and internationally.

“Suppressors have been in use for more than 100 years and are federally regulated, not banned,” the lawsuit states. “The ban imposes a blanket prohibition that fails constitutional scrutiny.”

The complaint emphasizes the impact on individual plaintiffs, including a disabled Marine veteran and firearms instructor, who says he relies on suppressors to protect what remains of his hearing.

A retired FDNY paramedic and former National Guard combat medic and a utility worker and licensed hunter, are also suing, claiming they would use suppressors if the state didn’t ban them.

The suit seeks a court order declaring the suppressor ban unconstitutional and an injunction blocking its enforcement.

Trending
Lt. Richard Mack’s orbital bone was broken when he was struck by at least two different protesters in a 2020 incident; one of the suspects was sentenced to community service
The trooper was working an overtime assignment at the reception desk when the 44-year-old gunman walked in, approached the trooper and fired, state police said
The juveniles told Newburgh Heights Police that they learned to steal the car by watching YouTube videos
Cpl. Matthew “Ty” Snook, 34, was fatally shot while working an overtime assignment and is credited with pushing a civilian to safety before being struck again

Anthony G. Attrino may be reached at tattrino@njadvancemedia.com.
©2025 Advance Local Media LLC. Visit nj.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Company News
Acquisition transforms how agencies equip first responders with life-saving information