On Thursday, February 19, 2026, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, was arrested in the United Kingdom on suspicion of misconduct in public office, amid allegations that sensitive material and overseas visit reporting were shared with deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Undoubtedly, the UK’s Thames Valley Police Department planned for Mountbatten-Winsor’s arrest, questioning, booking, and search of his multiple residences and electronic devices, and conferred with other governmental law enforcement agencies. The potential for an arrest was well known. On February 9, 2026, the BBC reported that the anti-monarchy group Republic filed a complaint with the agency over the alleged sharing of confidential material with Epstein. Mountbatten-Winsor’s arrest 10 days later was sufficient time to prepare, and by all accounts, it was uneventful.
Despite the lack of details, there are lessons to be learned as we watch cases involving high-profile individuals, political figures, celebrities, and sensational kidnappings as they play out in real time in our newsfeeds and on our televisions.
High-profile arrests generate their own gravity, and intense media coverage creates centrifugal forces that complicate operational control. The public is often drawn to the spectacle rather than the procedural details. Still, law enforcement leaders should use these moments to examine how their own agencies would respond under similar circumstances. Placing yourself in the position of a leader managing a high-visibility crisis is a worthwhile exercise. Who hasn’t asked themselves the same questions while watching the Guthrie disappearance case play out in Arizona?
For chiefs, sheriffs, and command staff, the leadership challenge is twofold: execute a legally sound operation and insulate the organization from the pressures that accompany high-profile events.
Treat the event as a major incident and plan accordingly
History shows that high-profile arrests fail in predictable ways: poor planning, sloppy evidence handling, weak officer safety tactics, lack of media control, and preventable public disorder. The solution is to scale discipline to the level of attention.
Start with a full threat/risk assessment. If your agency lacks resources or experience to plan and respond to major events, ask for assistance from those who do. Build a written operational plan that covers arrest team roles, arrest location, transport routes, custody booking, contingencies, and the evidence chain of custody for devices and documents. If searches or digital preservation are occurring in parallel, assign separate supervisors for evidence logging and digital forensics, because the most damaging errors are often administrative.
Resist the temptation to capitalize on an arrest for promotional purposes. Elections create pressure for visible success, and success stories can fuel career advancement, but the best operations are conducted with minimal notice and fanfare. Save the accolades for the press conference after the operation is complete, the evidence secured, and witnesses interviewed. Avoid the pressure to stage a “perp walk,” which can create problems during jury selection. Minor decisions have major consequences.
Operational discipline sets the tone
Treat high-profile arrests as major incidents with written operational plans, defined command authority and clear contingency planning.
Conduct early threat and risk assessments covering flight risk, evidence preservation, crowd control and media saturation.
Control the time and place of the arrest when legally permissible. Low drama is risk management, not favoritism.
Where law and policy permit, control the time and place of the arrest. If the investigation and allegations of criminal conduct have been widely reported and the risk of evidence destruction has been mitigated, an offer to surrender into custody might be appropriate. If a surrender is contemplated, ensure surveillance assets are in place beforehand to reduce flight risk.
Evaluate the benefits of a public arrest against the risks of a forced entry, whether with or without a warrant, and the likelihood that the defense will challenge the warrant and move to suppress evidence. A controlled arrest at a residence or secure site, where the suspect is contained, is often safer than a public confrontation. “Low drama” is not favoritism; it’s risk management.
Finally, deconflict security and other associates. Prominent suspects likely have highly trained, potentially armed personal protective details. Identify individuals who could prevent, hinder, or interfere with the arrest, including family members and other uninvolved persons, and assess the risk of evidence destruction. Even King Charles, Andrew’s brother, was not informed of the pending arrest for operational security reasons.
Insulating line officers and investigators from political pressure
Political interference rarely comes in the form of a blatant order. Law enforcement leaders are accountable not only to the public but also to the political infrastructure they serve. Requests for non-essential “briefings” or calls from political operatives should be declined unless operationally necessary. Some may stem from curiosity, but others are intended to extract information for less legitimate purposes. The mayor, city council members, county supervisors, media representatives, social influencers, friends, colleagues, and even academy classmates may reach out. Document every request, whether granted or refused, and assess its motivation. Emails, texts, and phone calls may later be requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), so proceed with caution.
Appoint a clear case commander/senior investigating officer with defined authority, and require decision logs for major determinations: why the arrest was necessary, why a search was justified, and what alternatives were considered. Documented necessity protects both the arresting officer and the agency.
In anticipation of an arrest, identify the suspect’s associates, supporters, detractors, including elected officials, donors, and other police leaders. Conduct risk assessments based on those relationships. If any law enforcement personnel are too closely involved, recuse or isolate them from the investigation, arrest, and prosecution. If your agency has an internal conflict of interest or creates the appearance of bias, consider transferring the investigation to another agency, such as the district attorney or the attorney general.
Protect investigative integrity
Document major decisions, including the necessity of arrest and search justification. Decision logs protect both officers and agencies.
Insulate investigators from political pressure and document all external contacts or briefing requests.
Maintain consistent policy application. Equal treatment does not require identical optics, but legal standards must not change.
Policies and leadership decisions that matter most
In a high-visibility arrest, every discretionary choice will be viewed as either special treatment or political punishment. Consistency is your best protection.
Arrest versus voluntary surrender is often the first flashpoint. Leaders must be able to explain necessity in plain language: risk to evidence, witnesses, or public safety; risk of flight; or the need for a prompt, effective investigation. If your rationale is simply “it’s easier,” expect it to fail in court and in the court of public opinion.
Standardize custody and recording procedures. Clear rules governing minimum necessary force, body-worn camera activation, documentation, medical screening, and access to counsel protect everyone. If a SWAT team is deployed, ensure agency criteria are met and clearly articulate the risks that justify its use. Dignity is not deference; it is professionalism, and it reduces liability and public anger. Bending standard rules “because of who it is” is how agencies lose legitimacy.
Issue a firm policy directive to all personnel involved in operational security, accountability, and information confidentiality. A careless comment, even to a colleague or family member, or in an unguarded public conversation, can compromise the case. The media employs both electronic and human intelligence capabilities that often rival or exceed our own. When plans and tactics surface in news reports citing “an unnamed police source,” reevaluate those plans and reassess operational security immediately. Unauthorized disclosures not only jeopardize investigations, arrests, and prosecutions but also place officers at risk.
Media strategy without contaminating the case
Silence breeds rumor, and over-disclosure undermines prosecutions. The objective is controlled transparency. The media will rely on “police experts” to comment on every aspect of the investigation and your agency’s response. Dispel rumors firmly and appropriately unless allowing limited misinformation serves a legitimate investigative purpose. Expect online speculation to fill any information gaps. If a rumor creates a public safety risk, correct it quickly with carefully limited facts. Communicate internally as well. Provide personnel with clear guidance on what is public and who is authorized to speak. Remind them that nothing is truly “off the record.”
Confirm the minimum necessary facts early. The Thames Valley Police Department’s statement on the arrest was concise: “We have today arrested a man in his sixties from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office… The man remains in police custody at this time.” Avoid details that identify witnesses, reveal investigative steps, or risk prejudicing proceedings. Speak with one voice through a single public information lead aligned with prosecutors and command staff. Any information released should protect the integrity of the case, though strategic disclosures may serve a legitimate purpose.
At some point, media briefings may exceed the public information officer’s role, and agency leaders will be required to justify their decisions. Be prepared with the facts and know when discussion is appropriate and when it is not. Never speculate. If necessary, defer to a subject-matter expert.
Avoid spectacle and manage transparency
Avoid performative tactics that create jury selection issues or undermine legitimacy.
Use controlled transparency with the media. Confirm minimum facts early, speak with one voice and never speculate.
Public trust: Equal treatment isn’t identical treatment
The principle that no one is above the law is tested most often when the suspect is famous or well-connected. The public will scrutinize fairness, independence, and transparency, not just whether an arrest occurred. Maintaining public trust is an ongoing responsibility. Consistent community engagement, clear policies, and open communication, both externally and within your organization, help ensure that when a high-profile arrest or investigation is required, the agency’s good faith is already established.
Police leaders must be prepared to explain why logistics may differ for a high-profile suspect (including security, timing, and crowd control), while reaffirming that legal standards do not change. The same thresholds apply. The same custody safeguards govern. The same prosecutorial tests remain in place. When leaders can articulate that distinction — equal treatment without performative spectacle — agencies can turn a volatile moment into a demonstration of legitimacy.
Conclusion
This article touches on only a few of the issues surrounding high-profile arrests, but the size of the agency or scope of the case matters little. Today, anyone with a cell phone and social media account has a broadcast studio in their pocket and the ability to hold any agency to the same standard. If you do not want your investigation dissected in real time, prepare for that inevitability.
Use the recent arrest of the former Prince Andrew as an opportunity to discuss how your agency would respond. The best defense is preparation. If operational experience or resources are lacking, address those gaps now. The next time your phone rings, you might hear, “Boss, we have a situation, and what are we going to do?”
| NEXT: Why conducting VIP investigations and arrests takes courage
