Trending Topics

3 Portland cops off protest duty to avoid potential contempt motion in court

Plaintiffs claim the city violated a court order that barred Portland officers from arresting or using force against journalists and legal observers

portland oregon george floyd protest

Dave Killen/The Oregonian

By Maxine Bernstein
oregonlive.com

PORTLAND — The city of Portland will remove three police officers from protest duty while they’re under investigation for allegedly using excessive force against ACLU legal observers and journalists.

The city didn’t identify the officers.

The move is part of an agreement the city reached with the ACLU, journalists and legal observers who sued the city and argued that police used inappropriate force against them during this year’s social justice protests.

With the negotiated pact, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Portland, the plaintiffs agreed not to pursue an immediate motion to ask a judge to find the city in contempt of a September court order that prohibited Portland officers from “arresting, threatening to arrest or using physical force” against journalists or legal observers. The city had agreed to the terms of the September preliminary injunction after facing a lawsuit filed by six journalists and legal observers.

Tuesday’s four-page agreement acknowledges only that the plaintiffs claimed the city violated the injunction on several occasions in August and September.

The claims include the dislocation of ACLU legal observer Kat Mahoney’s shoulder when police allegedly picked her up by her handcuffs during an Aug. 9 arrest; an officer’s alleged grabbing of ACLU legal observer Stasia Brownell by the throat and throwing her to the ground as she and another legal observer filmed the officer’s arrest of Mahoney; and several encounters with independent journalist Maranie Staab who said police pushed her in the back Aug. 10 while she tried to leave an area as ordered, used force against her on Aug. 16 in retaliation for filming an officer and used force against her on Sept. 29 when she was filming an officer pepper-spraying a protester.

The plaintiffs provided the city with video evidence of their allegations and were prepared to pursue a contempt motion against the city but decided to resolve the matter through negotiations, according to court records.

The city, by entering into the agreement, doesn’t admit liability or admit that any of the allegations are true.

The city is continuing to investigate them, the agreement says.

“Pending the resolution of its investigations, the City will remove” the three officers from “public-order policing duty involving contact with the public,” the agreement says.

If the city decides to reinstate any of the officers to protest work before the disciplinary process is completed, the city will give the plaintiffs at least three days’ notice before doing so to allow the plaintiffs to pursue a contempt motion.

The agreement was signed by attorney Matthew Borden, representing the plaintiffs, and Senior Deputy City Attorney Denis M. Vannier.

The three Portland officers are among a total of seven who have been removed from protest duty amid complaints and investigations, according to Portland Deputy Police Chief Chris Davis.

(c)2020 The Oregonian (Portland, Ore.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU