DALLAS — The Dallas Police Department announced changes to officers’ dress code rules, including loosening restrictions on tattoos and piercings, FOX 4 reported.
The changes were announced in a June 30 “Chief’s Update” memo. Chief Daniel C. Comeaux issued the memo as a modification to the department’s Uniforms and Personal Appearance General Orders.
| WATCH DECISION POINT: When officers enter a deadly stabbing scene
The new rules allow officers to wear department baseball caps or hats from approved police associations, FOX 4 reported. Visible hand and finger tattoos are now permitted, provided they are approved by the PD’s Body Art Approval Board.
The rules also allow for one nose stud on either side. Allowed nose piercings include a single plain gold or silver metallic ball, a single plain gold or silver circular flat stud or a single clear, round-cut gemstone.
The rule changes take effect immediately and will be officially published by the agency’s planning unit, FOX 4 reported.
The appearance policy changes follow other recent updates to the department’s uniform standards. In August 2025, Dallas police began allowing officers to wear cowboy hats on duty.
Do visible tattoos or nose piercings affect how the public perceives an officer? Why or why not?
Police1 readers respond:
- The nose thing is ridiculous. If you wanna go clubbing, that’s fine, but not on duty. Failure to stand up to politicians and discipline or terminate in order to save your own job.
- Absolutely! Police officers command presence is paramount with the public. There is no place in law enforcement whereby a uniformed officer should have body piercings, visible tattoos, facial hair (other then a well groomed mustache), or an unkempt hair style. Uniforms should be pressed, and shoes shined. Look sharp, act sharp, be sharp! These attributes are not only professional, they will most likely limit physical encounters and have the public see you as a serious 10-8 pro that you should always be.
- Yes… I think that it does affect the way we are perceived by the public as well as the inmates. When you look and act professional people tend to listen, receive , and respect what you have to say. That plays a critical role in the correctional profession.
- I think it could go both ways. Younger people may identify more with people who look like them, but older people will not. I think the nose studs are gross, and although I don’t know anyone personally who has one, I wonder if it could be an injury risk in a fight.
- I find myself frowning on the inside when I see officers with facial piercings. I have been numbed to all the tattoos, but I still don’t like them. I can’t speak for the entire “public” but I would think that if people like body piercings and tattoos, they won’t have a problem with police having them. If people don’t like piercings and tattoos, they won’t like officers having them either.
- Yes. Piercings and tattoos are a display of individuality. The vast majority of piercings and tattoos today have nothing to do with any cultural identity, people have them to show off their individuality. Police Departments need officers to represent order during chaos; putting themselves at risk to protect complete strangers. Police Departments should not pander to officers that was to look cool with a drop-down holster and a full sleeve tattoo.
- I’ve been serving since 1986 and have watched the transition from strict uniform and grooming standards to a more relaxed state. With more comfortable tactical style uniforms and gear set up, I personally believe it has helped. Having non offensive tattoos and piercings can have the ability to break down barriers and create a common ground that allows for dialogue and conversations thus leading to non confrontational compliance and a sense of trust and and community building. I’ve seen this first hand on many occasions, far to many to count. To this old vet, it kind of falls in line with community policing and building trust through common ground.
- So unprofessional! How many people aren’t getting hired because they have a nose piercing? So many, that even if they had one, they can’t work a shift without it? As for the hand tattoos, as long as their entire hand isn’t inked and isn’t offensive, go ahead. Seems like certain departments are lowering the bar to hire anyone they can and we’ve seen how that played out.
- I am a retired old school officer. I don’t like tattoos or piercings on officers. Our officers were always well groomed with clean uniforms. I believe appearance commands respect.
- Yes, it looks very unprofessional. You’re a police officer, you should take pride in the way you look, and look different from the people you’re dealing with. Visible tattoos should be covered up in my opinion!
- Remember when people — especially police officers — had pride in their appearance? Now everyone wants to look like ex-cons and trailer park dwellers. Classy...
- If I want a high school senior or college freshman, sure. BUT IF I want command presence. NO. Agencies are hiring trash, no physical standards, no personal appearance standards. All to fill seats, unofficial “quotas.”
- So unprofessional! How many people aren’t getting hired because they have a nose piercing? So many, that even if they had one, they can’t work a shift without it? As for the hand tattoos, as long as their entire hand isn’t inked and isn’t offensive, go ahead. Seems like certain departments are lowering the bar to hire anyone they can and we’ve seen how that played out.
- This is stupid! Why have uniform or dress codes? I guess I’m old school but what is next? Facial tattoos? Yes, this change in policy will negatively affect law enforcement efforts.
- Yes! Do you want to be a thug or a professional police officer? Just who are you identifying with? A professional appearance can go a long way to influence the outcome of a situation. Uniform standards should not be lowered just because “today’s” candidates are of the younger generation. They need to be held to the higher, old-school standards.