LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles Police Department released body-worn camera video after an officer fatally shot a dog while responding to a welfare check at a Canoga Park apartment.
The incident happened June 13 at an apartment in the 7500 block of Jordan Avenue, where officers were sent after a 911 caller reported hearing a woman screaming, according to LAPD’s critical incident briefing.
Officers later determined the woman had been celebrating the New York Knicks’ NBA championship win over the San Antonio Spurs.
The dog, identified by its owner as Jameson, was a 2-year-old golden Saint Bernard doodle. LAPD said the dog weighed about 106 pounds.
In the edited bodycam video released by the department, officers can be heard repeatedly telling the resident to secure the dog after it appeared in the doorway and began barking.
“Put your dog away,” one officer says, while another remarks that he does not want to be bitten by the animal.
After the resident briefly closes the door, officers ask whether the dog has been secured when she opens it again. The resident responds that the dog is “not aggressive” while stepping outside the door.
The dog then reappears, enters the hallway and barks as officers continue backing away from the apartment. Seconds later, one officer fires four rounds. The dog is struck and falls to the ground.
LAPD’s critical incident briefing states the dog “ran out of the apartment, began to bark once again, and charged at an officer,” resulting in the officer-involved shooting.
Multiple investigations underway
LAPD said the shooting remains under investigation and that the department’s understanding of the incident could change as additional evidence is reviewed.
The department’s Critical Incident Review Division will forward its findings to the chief of police, who will make a recommendation to the civilian Board of Police Commissioners. The board will determine whether the officer’s tactics, drawing and exhibiting of a firearm, and use of deadly force met department standards.
The Office of the Inspector General will also conduct a parallel review.
NBC Los Angeles reported that LAPD’s Internal Affairs Division has opened a separate investigation and that the department has received several citizen complaints related to the shooting.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said after the video’s release that she was concerned by what she saw and had directed LAPD leadership to review the department’s policy and training on encounters involving dogs.
Does your department have a written policy or specific training for dog encounters? If so, what tactics does it emphasize?
Police1 readers respond:
- Lethal force can only be use if there is no other choice, the TASER is our first choice.
- I am having a problem with the officer unholstering his service weapon before the dog was out. Why escalate the situation? When he drew his weapon, he was already in the mindset to shoot the dog. I have responded to calls where aggressive dogs have tried to charge me, but I never took out my service weapon. I yelled at the dog to stop, and he complied with my commands. Some dogs are friendly when they are barking because of the uniform’s color or sometimes because of what the officer fears that they can smell. I believe that dog was friendly and just scared because he did not know the officer. He could have used the TASER instead. Based on my knowledge of dog handling, that dog posed no threat. He was just being a dog.
- While tragic, the dog was clearly charging him and the officers had already ordered that the dog be put up. The officer clearly had no intention of being bit.
- Retired Firearms/Use of Force Instructor for 15 years. Pepper Spray WORKS on Dogs. I have seen too many knee-jerk reactions involving dogs. It is not MACHO to shoot a dog. Retired with 30 years of law enforcement experience. Law enforcement is seen as a career field. I have never seen any information suggesting that the use of that term creates negative public pushback. All levels of government enforce laws. People dislike receiving tickets, fines, and other penalties that have nothing to do with the terms we use for our actions. As for the legal limit, it is what the police use to protect the public. The term is accurate.
- Numerous public servants interact with dogs (including large and aggressive) safely without the options of tasers, pepper spray, or additional staff to assist. The fact that this officer could not find a less lethal response is sad and speaks to a lack of training, as well as a belief by many officers that any type of altercation warrants immediate deadly force. An application of OC, or TASER should have been used first. This officer’s choice to use deadly force placed the owner of the apartment and his partner (as well as others) at risk of great bodily harm, and is absolutely unacceptable.
- It’s not a problem until it’s a problem. I believe the officer in question handled the situation as well as it could be handled. I never go into an unknown situation without either my hand on my duty weapon or breaking leather altogether. No officer goes on duty hoping to discharge their weapon sometime during their tour, and, at the same time, every officer wants to go home the same way they went to work— unstabbed, unshot, UNBITTEN, UNMAULED, unharmed. We’re not rag dolls to be abused just to satisfy public sentiment. During my career, I’ve seen too many people mauled — to death in some instances — by dogs that were characterized as being “not aggressive”. I’m hoping public outcry won’t determine or influence this officer’s fate, but rather unbiased command leadership.
- Dog is a big dog. Looks small in only picture of animal as from the front view. I understand the shooting when a large barking dog is running towards you from a very short distance. It’s a shame. But I side with the officer!!
- LEO for years. Owner should have had the sense to obey the command to put the dog up when instructed. Her lack of ability to follow a four-word command resulted in property damage. You don’t want your dog shot, be responsible for it and for yourself. A complete lack of accountability is emphasized by the repeatedly weepy bleeding hearts in the responses. I do not care if OC or a taser might be effective in an ideal situation. The dog was 2.5-3 feet away from him in a hallway and gap closing, please tell me how effective an NMI you’d get on the side body of a dog at 2.5ft, or how likely you’d be to OC a dog at lunge distance, accepting the risk of a nice permanent scar or nerve damage in one of the arms you’ll use for the rest of your life. It’s irrelevant to me what happens to your dog when you aren’t capable of listening.
- As someone who grew up around dogs and pit bulls, I would never shoot a dog. I responded to a call where an officer was asking for help because a dog was charging him. When I arrived at the scene, he was standing on top of his police car, and the dog was barking and jumping to get to him. I got out of my police car, the dog looked at me, and started to run toward me. I yelled at the dog to stop, which it did. I then yelled at it to sit, and it obeyed. My partner told me I was crazy for not shooting it. I told him you have to show command presence, and they will listen to you. The dog that was killed in the video was scared and meant no harm to the officer, in my opinion. I cannot tell you what was going through the officer’s mind when he shot, but I would not have done it because I know how they behave.
- How asinine to shoot a dog wearing a t-shirt who clearly posed no risk to the officers.
- Been doing this a long time, that dog did not need shooting.
- The officer drew his firearm after a bark, should have drawn TASER. Plus, they didn’t give her enough time to put her dog up before asking again. Impatient and scarred cause of a dog, find another occupation.
- I was taught 30 years ago to use OC against dogs. I have sprayed approximately 5 or 6 dogs in my career and in every instance, that dog wanted nothing more to do with me. OC is an extremely effective tool that many officers aren’t trained to use on dogs. That dog in the video absolutely did not need to die, and the last 2 shots while the dog was down isn’t a good look for law enforcement. Judging by the officer’s comments prior to the shooting, it appears he may have a fear of dogs. That’s the only reason I could imagine for him to shoot the dog 4 times.
- It seems clear to me that this dog did not need to be shot four times and killed. The officer had other options to stop it. I hope and pray that this officer receives severe disciplinary actions. In my opinion, he is in the wrong profession.
- Police officers have to be trained when coming in contact with an owner’s pet. They shouldn’t think to pull their gun on a person’s dog.
- The dog posed no threat, and it did not “charge.” The dog acted like a dog, and the officer gave it a death sentence. The people defending the cop are all really stupid. If they want dead dogs, they don’t belong in civilized society.
- I love companion animals, but also know that they can be unpredictable...as they are animals. Now, as a responsible adult, they would not be allowed to be in a position to run past me out the door. Secured in another room or a crate, especially if the police are the ones at my door! Once the dog got out, it became a dangerous situation for everyone present and, ultimately for other residents in that building. It didn’t have to be any of that, and that is the shame of this incident. Be responsible for your companion animals in every way!
- Honestly, she should have put the dog away. Also could have closed the door. She was asked multiple times, if the dog was put away. I like dogs and cats, and we have to be responsible for their health, welfare, and including security.
