Trending Topics

Pa. mayor criticizes newly hired cop who quit PD to join ‘Love Island': ‘Never thought I’d see the day’

Bethlehem officials said taxpayers funded Sean Reifel’s academy training before he left the police department less than a year after being sworn in

BETHLEHEM, Pa. — A former Bethlehem Police officer is caught up in drama on TV and at home after the town’s mayor complained he had wasted resources by leaving the force to join the reality show “Love Island USA,” FOX 8 reported.

Sean Reifel, 29, was recently announced as a cast member of the dating show, which places single individuals together in an island villa and requires them to form couples in order to stay on the show. A $100,000 prize awaits the show’s winner(s).

| DOWNLOAD: What Cops Want in 2026 survey results

In the first episode of season 8, Reifel spoke about his work on the force, telling viewers that working as an officer makes “you feel like you made a difference.” He was sent home during episode 5, becoming the first “islander” to get dumped in season 8.

Reifel was sworn into the Bethlehem Police Department in August 2025. He resigned from the department in May to appear on the show, Bethlehem Police Chief Michelle Kott told The Morning Call.

“I love Sean, he’s a good guy, he was a great officer, but I’m disappointed,” Kott told The Morning Call. “Just because we work so incredibly hard to try to recruit the best people we can to be part of the Bethlehem Police Department.”

Reifel’s departure also drew ire from Bethlehem’s mayor.

“Our police department spent a lot of time training and we paid thousands of taxpayer dollars to send him to the police academy. We are disappointed he left as we now have another vacancy in our department that is impossible to fill until next year ...” Mayor J. William Reynolds told FOX 8. “I never thought I’d see the day in America where reality show participation wins out over being a police officer.”

The officer’s resignation raises a question for law enforcement agencies: Should officers who leave soon after being hired have to reimburse departments for taxpayer-funded training?



Police1 readers respond:

  • Those who leave voluntarily before a limited period? Yes, absolutely. When I hired on in 1988, I believe my department had a two-year requirement for paying back for your training (prorated by time served). I felt it was reasonable.
  • Why wasn’t he given a leave of absence to go on the show? Secondly, if he wants to come back, why not re-hire him?
  • As a rule, they should absolutely have to reimburse the agency! But allow some flexibility! In my day, this was a CAREER, and I could not believe I was getting paid to have this much fun. Today, it is a JOB, 9 to 5, and don’t bother me at 5:01! Offer an added incentive that would have to be paid back if they leave in less than five years, as a minimum!
  • They should have a two-year commitment and have to reimburse the agency for all training if they leave for another agency or anywhere else.
  • Even if they leave to go to another department I feel they should reimburse the department’s cost for the training they received if they leave within 5 years. It takes about $100,000 in cost to train a cadet/recruit in the police academy. This is a huge cost to the taxpayers.
  • Most departments have a contract requiring that a new officer remain employed for a specific amount of time, or they will be liable for the funds used to train them. I believe that this is fair and appropriate.
  • We require a two-year commitment. We have not always held the officers to it. Who wants an officer in the department who does not want to be there?
  • I think that a reasonable option would be to have officers sign an agreement to serve x number of years and if not, they are required to pay back their training.
  • Our agency expects officers to sign a contract committing to three years as a requirement for academy training. If you go to another agency, that agency has to buy out that contract. But we don’t enforce the contract if the officer chooses to leave law enforcement altogether.
  • My department has that policy. If an officer leaves during his/her probationary period. They are required to pay back the city for expenses. Pre-employment appointments, medical, polygraph, psych exam, equipment purchased as well as academy costs. That also sounds like a sign of burnout.
  • Yes, they should sign a contract; if they quit or leave before a certain time, they should have to repay the department the cost of the training.
  • Yes if they leave voluntarily before their probation is complete, they should reimburse, specifically if they leave for another department or another job. If they do not make probation, then no. It’s the gamble to take when you have new hires. In this case, yes he should be held for the cost. Pro rated though
  • Absolutely, especially if it’s for something stoooopid like this.
  • According to Sean, he took unpaid leave, which doesn’t sound like resignation. Instead of supporting a young officer who clearly made a positive impact on your community before he took leave to live out a dream for a few weeks, you practically demonize him as if he cannot have a life outside your PD. You could have created a space for the rest of the country to learn about Bethlehem, spend their tourist dollars there, and encourage other young adults to consider jobs in law enforcement, when so many people are distrusting and afraid of police. There could have been a huge welcome home for him whenever he comes back. But you chose to chastise and basically insult a young man of color. The dynamics here aren’t lost on us, and honestly, this makes me reconsider spending my own dollars in Bethlehem like I do multiple times a year, driving out from Philly. Such a missed opportunity here on so many levels. The Mayor’s office and Bethlehem PD need better PR teams.
  • Yes, officers should sign a two to three year agreement and if they leave before that they should have to pay for their academy training. I had to agree to a three year contract when I became a K-9 officer. Some departments that are recruiting officers are paying the previous departments. Don’t forget uniforms and body armor expenses.
  • I’ve always said that law enforcement ought to be like the military. You sign a contract for X number of years and you are held to that. You can’t just leave. Re-enlistment possibility at the end of said contract. And that’s for all rank and file officers. Mirror the military with discharges as well. And after spending X number of years (I’m thinking 20) you can retire with full benefits plus medical insurance. We get nothing after retirement. The VA isn’t the best but it’s better than nothing at all.
  • This could have been a blessing in disguise, it’s obvious his head wasn’t in the game, so why waste any more time with him. He made his choice, and now he has to live with it, yes he spent taxpayers’ money on training, but better to find out now than to waste millions in the end.
  • Y’all don’t care about our tax dollars any other time, why care now? He loves his career as a cop, so I’m confused as to why that is up for debate. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that he got to explore and that’s a lot of people’s problem y’all don’t enjoy and live life! Y’all let y’all’s lives run you! The mayor shouldn’t have said anything, it was very unprofessional. Period.
  • People are entitled to leave organizations for any reason. At least he didn’t do while employed by the police department. The public would’ve been much more upset. It costs a ton of resources to the organization, but it’s an undesirable position by volume.
  • Not unless there’s a contract. Happens every day. Pay well, treat them well, they’ll stay. Don’t? Well, they look for greener grass...
  • You’re either committed to being a law enforcement officer or you’re not. At age 52 I still wanted to be a cop so I paid my own way through the academy.
  • Yes, absolutely! Just like many other jobs you have a probation period. This is an instance where a probation period should be in place and if not met you have to reimburse those who paid for you to go to begin with. I mean, I would like to see my hard-earned money go towards things for people who actually appreciate it.
  • Y’all are too serious about this. Like he said, it’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, people should take it if they are able to. The worst thing is to regret not going for an opportunity that could benefit you. Doing the same thing over and over. He saw his chance and went through with it. They can still rehire him, like what’s the big deal?
  • Our department requires new hires to sign a 3 year contract that requires them to pay back the remaining portion of the contract based on when they leave, IF they leave, within that 3 year period.
  • No, he shouldn’t have to pay them back. If they did not have a contract in place where he had to stay a certain amount of time, then he doesn’t have to pay anything back. He spent his time to be there and then it’s not like he just left on a whim. He gave y’all notice, and everyone knew where he was going before he left. Why did y’all not just give him a leave of absence? Y’all give leave of absence to cops who are under suspicion for doing something wrong, but he can’t make a choice on his personal life and get a leave of absence. He was gone 5 days. Are y’all really that upset? Also, it’s not like he would not have come back to be on the force. Y’all could literally just rehire him, whether he has to go through the training again or not. Although I don’t see why he has to go through the entire thing if he’s only been gone 5 days, but that’s just my opinion.
  • You just left the world’s greatest unscripted reality show to join a scripted “reality” show for maybe $100K? Sounds like Bethlehem dodged one.
  • Some departments require they commit to specific time to stay with the department if they foot the bill to send them to the Academy. If they leave before their “contract, “ then they are obligated to repay the department.
  • I definitely believe leaving before a year is up they should repay it if it is of their choosing to leave unless unforeseen circumstances such as medical.
  • There should be an appropriate commitment or requirement of any officer to commit to the job, assuming resources have been spent on his training unless there are extenuating circumstances! Monetary repayment is one of the options to be determined by the appropriate authority.

Trending
The Meriden Police officer had to fire nearly 20 rounds before the suspect stopped the ultimately fatal attack
Glendale PD officers responded after a woman asked gun store employees to call 911 as the man accompanying her became increasingly aggressive
A pickup truck driven by a motorist later suspected of driving under the influence came within inches of hitting the Placer County Sheriff’s deputy when it sideswiped a parked truck
“Los Servidores” performed a Spanish rendition of “Walking on Sunshine” that earned a standing ovation from the crowd and two judges
Company News
Milestone marks a significant step toward full FedRAMP Authorization and signals Clearview AI’s commitment to meeting the federal government’s most rigorous cloud security standards

Joanna Putman is an Associate Editor and newswriter at Police1, where she has been covering law enforcement topics since August 2023. Based in Orlando, Florida, she holds a journalism degree from the University of Florida and spent two years working in nonprofit local newsrooms, gaining experience in community-focused reporting. Married to a law enforcement officer, she works hard to highlight the challenges and triumphs of those who serve and protect. Have a news tip? Email her at news@lexipol.com